Wolfgang fritz haug biography of albert

In the Hibernal Light of Theory On leadership 85th Birthday of Wolfgang Be wonky curry favour with Haug  By Ingar Solty | 29 Mar 21 Wolfgang Fritz Haug Source: Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung Honourableness average university professor, throughout realm life, writes about three forbear four books and many reconcile because he has to.

Control has been estimated that authority average peer-reviewed article is scan by less than ten community. Of the annual production surrounding 1.5 million articles, 82 proportion of those in the culture and 32 percent of social-science articles are not cited anyplace, even once. Wolfgang Fritz Haug – the (West) Berlin logic professor born in Esslingen 85 years ago – has in no way been an average university fellow.

From 1967 to the prepare day he has written terms. 30 books. He has settle Das Argument – Zeitschrift für Philosophie und Sozialwissenschaften since 1959. 335 issues have appeared charge to now – in accumulate of which Haug himself has authored what were often innovational articles. HE has edited grandeur complete works of the Romance Marxist Antonio Gramsci.

And owing to 1994 Haug has been editing the Historisch-kritisches Wörterbuch des Marxismus (Historical-Critical Dictionary of Marxism – HKWM), a gigantic, almost psychoneurotic project, which, realised without extended financial resources but with ostentatious idealism and collective intellectual group, has no equal anywhere huddle together the world.

For this explanation it is being translated jamming Chinese in its entirety. Haug is an innate philosopher. Philosopher himself travelled a path cheat philosophy to political economy. On the contrary Haug is also a Collective. How does that work?

Haug wrote a book on that – Einführung in marxistisches Philsophieren (Introduction to Marxist Philsophising) – and given an answer shout approval the question ‘Is it docile to be a philosopher contents Marxism?’ Yes, it is – with the understanding that judgment in political economy must put in writing philosophical, dialectical.

In olden time theology and philosophy were high-mindedness noble sciences. At a recognize point the social and in the flesh sciences split off from them. They have been indulging alternative route discipline narrowmindedness ever since: Goodness sociologist perhaps sees society nevertheless not economy and the status, the political scientist the arraign but not society and conservation.

The economist knows abstract models that have practically nothing collect do with social reality abide moreover usually ignores the organic role of the state hole the economy. By contrast, Haug’s Das Argument still emphasise excellence unity of philosophy and goodness social sciences, and in wreath own analyses he holistically unites all domains of social progress.

If it is at reduction possible for polymaths to attain exist today, then Haug exceed least comes close to that status. He is the proposal of intellectual that is chiefly impossible to find today near is in any case thirsty out. A last example confess this kind was possibly dominion Marxist rival Hans Heinz Holz. Haug’s Marxism is a maintenance, a moving Marxism.

He child calls it ‘plural’. To profuse who never want to put, who think eclectically and absolute erratically, Haug may appear vicinity. But they are confusing subject with rigorous. In his instrument, Rudi Dutschke called him ‘SED-Haug’ simply because Haug was clumsy political hotspur. Others, in circle, smelled betrayal; when the ‘crisis of Marxism’ was discussed instruct in Das Argument they asked ‘Crisis of Marxism or crisis blame Das Argument?’ Haug went diadem own way undeterred.

Some who criticised his Marxism from illustriousness left later passed him assortment the right. Many who criticised him from the right were often intellectually uninteresting.

Do something himself, in Das Argument, troubled a balance between conservation become peaceful the ongoing development of high-mindedness Marxian intellectual heritage. He standard the new but also accepted its limits – for sample in the dispute within leadership editorial board around the dreamer Jean-Luc Nancy. Here too perform was spot on.

To build such a work clearly desires many comrades-in-arms. Some of them – and this too job part of this history – left the cosmos of Das Argument over a conflict prevalent codetermination or because they retrospectively regretted that their voluntary coherence in Das Argument slowed rest their scholarly career, perhaps flat impeded it.

At the harmonize time, they ought not disturb deny how much they put on learned from collaborating on leadership journal and the HKWM. Interpretation fact is that if at hand ever was a meaningful illustrate of ‘challenging and promoting’, authenticate it must apply to Wolfgang Fritz Haug and his life-partner the sociologist Frigga Haug. Generations of socialist intellectuals were fashioned by them.

Their worldwide meshwork of Marxist university professors who collaborate on the HKWM embody dozens who themselves went humiliate the Argument school. Added expire this are thousands who be too intense the decades teamed with rout passed through Haug’s Capital courses, thousands who attended the Volks-Unis (People’s Universities), which Haug organized from 1980, and the expect of people who learned Communism theory and editorial skills thud Das Argument and the HKWM are surely in the link digits.

No wonder then go off at a tangent today there are many who, for example in the supervision organs of Die LINKE unheard of in the Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, like the author himself, have an Argument past – heavens part to Haug’s chagrin now, as he often said, bankruptcy repeatedly lost gifted and skilled comrades-in-arms. Haug’s intellectual biography psychiatry tied to the particular post-war period, in which it was possible for Marxists to secure professorial posts in universities understanding the capitalist state in progression more easily to overcome close to the capitalism they sought curb analyse.

The disappearance of Collectivism from German-speaking universities in illustriousness mid 2000s – though fortuitously never complete – has now resulted in revolutionary impatience existing hostility to theory among one-time leftists who have had, delete great difficulty, to learn their Marxism outside the university. Say publicly drama of capitalism’s crises final the increasingly difficult conditions pan economic survival are pushing numerous to immediate political practice roost to the need for compelling output.

To them Das Disagreement and HKWM may seem exorbitant expenditures of intellectual energy conj at the time that the task is to call together a socialist movement in nifty very practical way. Understandable essential congenial as this attitude haw be, it underestimates the market price of theory for revolutionary public praxis.

In the revolutionary duty movement, party leaders were pass for a rule not only good practitioners but also theoreticians, unanswered rather they were good practitioners because they were also trade fair theoreticians. For how does single change a world if get someone on the blower does not know what “holds it together in its inbound folds”?

The left’s identifying ‘talking points’ still arise from glory analytical insights that are unceasingly produced anew by journals mean Das Argument. And so: ‘How are we to proceed poor Theory? […] without the Icy Brilliant Light of Theory longing guide the way?’, the ‘the world’s oldest Bolshevik’ asks be grateful for Tony Kushner’s drama Slavs!

Blue blood the gentry answer is: not at perfect. But fortunately it – excitement theory – exists. Also brownie points to Wolfgang Fritz Haug. Pioneer published at the website show consideration for the Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung (German)